EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 7502P
EPYC 4484PX vs EPYC 7502P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4484PX vs EPYC 7502P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4484PX vs EPYC 7502P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4484PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 279.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.4 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,547 vs 51,206).
EPYC 7502P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($2,300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4484PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4484PX better than EPYC 7502P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4484PX vs EPYC 7502P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4484PX
The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.
EPYC 7502P
The EPYC 7502P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 51,206 points. Launch price was $2,300.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7502P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7502P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502P — a 50.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7502P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the EPYC 7502P's 51,206 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7502P. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | EPYC 7502P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+67% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+76% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 50,547 | 51,206+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7502P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7502P — the EPYC 4484PX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7502P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (EPYC 7502P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 128 (EPYC 7502P) — the EPYC 7502P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and SP3 (EPYC 7502P).
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | EPYC 7502P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+63% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7502P). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7502P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; EPYC 7502P rivals Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | EPYC 7502P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation / Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4484PX was priced at $599, while the EPYC 7502P came in at $2300. On launch pricing ($599 vs $2300), EPYC 4484PX was $1701 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4484PX delivers 84.4 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7502P — making the EPYC 4484PX the 116.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | EPYC 7502P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-74% | $2300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.4+278% | 22.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4484PX and EPYC 7502P
