
EPYC 4484PX

Xeon Gold 5412U
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4484PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 185W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5412U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,547 vs 51,599).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5412U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5412U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌54.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Xeon Gold 5412U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4484PX
The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

Xeon Gold 5412U
The Xeon Gold 5412U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 51,599 points. Launch price was $1,113.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5412U offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5412U has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5412U — a 35.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5412U uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Xeon Gold 5412U's 51,599 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5412U. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 5412U.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Xeon Gold 5412U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+44% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+110% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+184% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 50,547 | 51,599+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5412U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5412U supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5412U). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5412U) — the Xeon Gold 5412U offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5412U).
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Xeon Gold 5412U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5412U). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5412U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Xeon Gold 5412U rivals EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Xeon Gold 5412U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation / Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















