EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U

AMD

EPYC 4484PX

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5412U

24 Cores48 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4484PX

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 120W instead of 185W, a 65W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5412U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (50,547 vs 51,599).
  • Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5412U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 5412U

2023

Why buy it

  • +2.1% higher PassMark.
  • 185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 54.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 120W.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Xeon Gold 5412U?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4484PX is ahead with a 25.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5412U pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark. EPYC 4484PX also has the bigger cache pool with 184.4% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 45 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5412U is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4484PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4484PX comes in at an unclear MSRP at $599 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 5412U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (84.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4484PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 45 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Gold 5412U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4484PX

The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5412U

The Xeon Gold 5412U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 51,599 points. Launch price was $1,113.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5412U offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5412U has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5412U — a 35.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5412U uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Xeon Gold 5412U's 51,599 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5412U. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 5412U.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon Gold 5412U
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock
5.6 GHz+44%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+110%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+184%
45 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
50,547
51,599+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,950
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5412U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5412U supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5412U). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5412U) — the Xeon Gold 5412U offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5412U).

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon Gold 5412U
Socket
AM5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
5200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
80+186%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5412U). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5412U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Xeon Gold 5412U rivals EPYC 9384X.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon Gold 5412U
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation / Server