EPYC 4484PX
VS
Xeon 6511P

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon 6511P

AMD

EPYC 4484PX

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon 6511P

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4484PX

#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
136%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
135%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
135%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
130%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
130%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
127%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
121%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
120%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
117%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
103%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6511P

#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
106%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
106%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
100%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
100%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
98%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The EPYC 4484PX leads in gaming performance. However, the Xeon 6511P is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightEPYC 4484PXXeon 6511P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($599)
⚠️ Higher cost ($815)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The EPYC 4484PX leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 27% cheaper ($599 vs $815) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightEPYC 4484PXXeon 6511P
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+34%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($599)
⚠️ Higher cost ($815)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6511P

AMD

EPYC 4484PX

The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel

Xeon 6511P

The Xeon 6511P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 51,286 points. Launch price was $815.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6511P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6511P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6511P — a 28.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6511P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Xeon 6511P's 51,286 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon 6511P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,950 vs 1,800, a 48.4% lead for the EPYC 4484PX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,500 vs 20,000 (13.3% advantage for the Xeon 6511P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6511P.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon 6511P
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock
5.6 GHz+33%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+91%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+78%
72 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm
Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
50,547
51,286+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,950+64%
1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,500
20,000+14%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6511P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon 6511P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (Xeon 6511P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 136 (Xeon 6511P) — the Xeon 6511P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and C741 (Xeon 6511P).

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon 6511P
Socket
AM5
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
136+386%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6511P). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6511P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server, Xeon 6511P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Xeon 6511P rivals EPYC 9684X.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon 6511P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation / Server
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4484PX launched at $599 MSRP, while the Xeon 6511P debuted at $815. At current prices ($599 vs $815), the EPYC 4484PX is $216 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4484PX delivers 84.4 pts/$ vs 62.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6511P — making the EPYC 4484PX the 29.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon 6511P
MSRP
$599-27%
$815
Avg Price (30d)
$599-27%
$815
Performance per Dollar
84.4+34%
62.9
Release Date
2024
2025