EPYC 4484PX
Xeon 6511P
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon 6511P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon 6511P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon 6511P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4484PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $216 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.4 vs 62.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6511P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,500 vs 20,000).
Xeon 6511P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+14.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅385.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.9 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($815 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Xeon 6511P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon 6511P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4484PX
The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.
Xeon 6511P
The Xeon 6511P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 51,286 points. Launch price was $815.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6511P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6511P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6511P — a 28.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6511P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Xeon 6511P's 51,286 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon 6511P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,950 vs 1,800, a 48.4% lead for the EPYC 4484PX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,500 vs 20,000 (13.3% advantage for the Xeon 6511P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6511P.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+33% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+91% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+78% | 72 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 50,547 | 51,286+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,950+64% | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | 20,000+14% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6511P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6511P — the Xeon 6511P supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6511P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (Xeon 6511P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 136 (Xeon 6511P) — the Xeon 6511P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and C741 (Xeon 6511P).
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 136+386% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6511P). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6511P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server, Xeon 6511P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Xeon 6511P rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation / Server | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4484PX was priced at $599, while the Xeon 6511P came in at $815. On launch pricing ($599 vs $815), EPYC 4484PX was $216 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4484PX delivers 84.4 pts/$ vs 62.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6511P — making the EPYC 4484PX the 29.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Xeon 6511P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-27% | $815 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.4+34% | 62.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4484PX and Xeon 6511P
