EPYC 4484PX
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4484PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,547 vs 51,646).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4484PX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 better than EPYC 4484PX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4484PX
The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 2.2% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+10% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 50,547 | 51,646+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 53.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4484PX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the EPYC 4484PX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 8000+54% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4484PX) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation / Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4484PX was priced at $599, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($599 vs $0), Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 was $599 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4484PX and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
