EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

AMD

EPYC 4484PX

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4484PX

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +32.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $5,346 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
  • Delivers 899.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
  • Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

  • 185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (50,189 vs 50,547).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.
  • No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?
Yes. EPYC 4484PX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 32.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4484PX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 32.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 60 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4484PX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4484PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4484PX comes in $5,346 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $5,945 MSRP, and it still gives you a 32.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 899.6% better value on MSRP (84.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4484PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 60 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4484PX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4484PX

The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4484PX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 30.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 4484PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
32 / 64+167%
Boost Clock
5.6 GHz+37%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+57%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+113%
60 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm-50%
10 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
50,547
50,189
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,950
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Socket
AM5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
5600+8%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
80+186%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation / Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4484PX was priced at $599, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ came in at $5945. On launch pricing ($599 vs $5945), EPYC 4484PX was $5346 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4484PX delivers 84.4 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the EPYC 4484PX the 163.6% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4484PXXeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP
$599-90%
$5945
Performance per Dollar
84.4+905%
8.4
Release Date
2024
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.