EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4585PX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $3,296 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
  • Delivers 487.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
  • Draws 170W instead of 205W, a 35W reduction.
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

  • 128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (68,643 vs 70,563).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 20.6% higher power demand at 205W vs 170W.
  • Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4585PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?
Yes. EPYC 4585PX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 32.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4585PX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 32.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 48 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4585PX is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4585PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4585PX comes in $3,296 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $3,995 MSRP, and it still gives you a 32.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 487.5% better value on MSRP (100.9 vs 17.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4585PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 48 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4585PX

The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX is built on the Grado (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXXeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+68%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.3 GHz+95%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+167%
48 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-60%
10 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
PassMark
70,563+3%
68,643
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the EPYC 4585PX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

FeatureEPYC 4585PXXeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket
AM5
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600+75%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
256
4096+1500%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
64+129%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXXeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($699 vs $3995), EPYC 4585PX was $3296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the EPYC 4585PX the 141.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4585PXXeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP
$699-83%
$3995
Performance per Dollar
100.9+487%
17.2
Release Date
2025
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.