
EPYC 4585PX

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,296 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 487.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 205W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (68,643 vs 70,563).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌20.6% higher power demand at 205W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4585PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX is built on the Grado (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+68% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+95% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+167% | 48 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | — |
| PassMark | 70,563+3% | 68,643 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the EPYC 4585PX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y came in at $3995. On launch pricing ($699 vs $3995), EPYC 4585PX was $3296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the EPYC 4585PX the 141.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-83% | $3995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9+487% | 17.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















