EPYC 4585PX
Xeon Platinum 8571N
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Platinum 8571N needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 300 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.9 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023Why buy it
- ✅+134.4% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.2 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (68,385 vs 70,563).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Xeon Platinum 8571N?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4585PX vs Xeon Platinum 8571N Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.
Xeon Platinum 8571N
The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4585PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 4585PX uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4585PX scores 70,563 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 52 / 104+225% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+43% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+79% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+134% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 70,563+3% | 68,385 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 60,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4585PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — the EPYC 4585PX supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4585PX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4585PX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+17% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8571N). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4585PX was priced at $699, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N came in at $599. On launch pricing ($699 vs $599), Xeon Platinum 8571N was $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4585PX delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 12.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4585PX | Xeon Platinum 8571N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $599-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9 | 114.2+13% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4585PX and Xeon Platinum 8571N
