EPYC 7262
VS
Ryzen 5 3600

EPYC 7262 vs Ryzen 5 3600

AMD

EPYC 7262

8 Cores16 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7262

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
500%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
4%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
9%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
8%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
8%
#5
EPYC 7262
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
8%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
94%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
84%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
65%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1410%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1332%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
967%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
291%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
202%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
116%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
114%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
103%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
100%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
99%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
98%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
95%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
93%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
92%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
91%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
91%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
88%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
85%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
85%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
85%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
83%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
83%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7262 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7262Ryzen 5 3600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 3600 ($80), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($80 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7262Ryzen 5 3600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7262 and Ryzen 5 3600

AMD

EPYC 7262

The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7262 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7262 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7262 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7262 scores 20,779 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 16.1% lead for the EPYC 7262. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 9,500 (19% advantage for the EPYC 7262). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,346 vs 1,295, a 3.9% lead for the EPYC 7262 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,900 vs 1,898 (122.5% advantage for the EPYC 7262). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 7262Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz+24%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
20,779+17%
17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,500+21%
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,346+4%
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,900+316%
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7262 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7262 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7262) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7262) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the EPYC 7262 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7262) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

FeatureEPYC 7262Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
SP3
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+3100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureEPYC 7262Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
Yes
Target Use
Budget Server / Multi-thread computing
Gaming/Budget Workstation