EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 7371

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 7371 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7282

16 / 32

30,201

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

EPYC 7371

16 / 32

30,156

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 7371 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 7371: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7371 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 15,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7371 better than EPYC 7282?

Yes. EPYC 7371 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7371 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7371 is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7371 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7282 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7371 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $650 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7282 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7282 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 7371 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7282 and EPYC 7371 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 7371 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 7371 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the EPYC 7371's 30,156 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7282. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 15,000 (10.5% advantage for the EPYC 7371). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 1,216, a 11.3% lead for the EPYC 7371 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,638 vs 6,941 (9.6% advantage for the EPYC 7282). L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371.

Feature	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	64 MB	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8 MB	512K (per core)+6300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	30,201	30,156
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	15,000+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,086	1,216+12%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,638+10%	6,941

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7371 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 — the EPYC 7282 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7371).

Feature	EPYC 7282	EPYC 7371
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+20%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+100%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7371 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server, EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.