
EPYC 7282

Xeon Gold 6246R
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 6246R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 6246R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 6246R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7282
2019Why buy it
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 16,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6246R better than EPYC 7282?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 6246R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Xeon Gold 6246R
The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7282 and Xeon Gold 6246R share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the Xeon Gold 6246R's 30,468 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 16,000 (16.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 1,293, a 17.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,638 vs 9,848 (25.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 16 MB+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,201 | 30,468 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | 16,000+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,086 | 1,293+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,638 | 9,848+29% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6246R — the EPYC 7282 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6246R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7282) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6246R) — the EPYC 7282 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R).
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+9% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6246R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6246R). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server, Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Edge Server / Entry Server | High-frequency Server / Financial |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















