EPYC 7282 vs Xeon W-3265

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7282

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3265

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon W-3265 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7282

16 / 32

30,201

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon W-3265

24 / 48

30,105

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon W-3265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon W-3265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Costs $3,034 less on MSRP ($650 MSRP vs $3,684 MSRP).
✅Delivers 468.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.5 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($650 MSRP vs $3,684 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3265

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (30,105 vs 30,201).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 46.5 PassMark/$ ($3,684 MSRP vs $650 MSRP).
❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7282 better than Xeon W-3265?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3265 is ahead with a 26.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7282 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. EPYC 7282 also has the bigger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7282 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7282 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7282 comes in $3,034 cheaper on MSRP at $650 MSRP versus $3,684 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3265 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 26.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 468.6% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 8.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3265 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon W-3265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Xeon W-3265

The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7282 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3265 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-3265 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the Xeon W-3265's 30,105 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7282. L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265.

Feature	EPYC 7282	Xeon W-3265
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+94%	33 MB
L2 Cache	8 MB	24 MB+200%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	30,201	30,105
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,086	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,638	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 — the EPYC 7282 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7282) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265) — the EPYC 7282 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265).

Feature	EPYC 7282	Xeon W-3265
Socket	SP3	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+9%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+300%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3265 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs true (Xeon W-3265). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.

Feature	EPYC 7282	Xeon W-3265
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	true
Target Use	Edge Server / Entry Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7282 was priced at $650, while the Xeon W-3265 came in at $3684. On launch pricing ($650 vs $3684), EPYC 7282 was $3034 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7282 delivers 46.5 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265 — making the EPYC 7282 the 140.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7282	Xeon W-3265
MSRP	$650-82%	$3684
Performance per Dollar	46.5+467%	8.2
Release Date	2019	2019

Search EPYC 7282 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3265 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.