EPYC 7282 vs Xeon W-3265
EPYC 7282
Xeon W-3265
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7282
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7282 | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7282 | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1614%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3265
EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.
Xeon W-3265
The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7282 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3265 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-3265 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the Xeon W-3265's 30,105 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7282. L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+4% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+94% | 33 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB+200% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,201 | 30,105 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,086 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,638 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 — the Xeon W-3265 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7282) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265) — the EPYC 7282 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265).
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2933+73225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+419430300% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3265 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs true (Xeon W-3265). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | true |
| Target Use | Edge Server / Entry Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7282 launched at $650 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3265 debuted at $3684. At current prices ($199 vs $3400), the EPYC 7282 is $3201 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7282 delivers 151.8 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265 — making the EPYC 7282 the 177.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $650-82% | $3684 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199-94% | $3400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 151.8+1606% | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3265
