EPYC 7282 vs Xeon 6357P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7282

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6357P

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon 6357P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7282

16 / 32

30,201

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon 6357P

8 / 16

30,401

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon 6357P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon 6357P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6357P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 18,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6357P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6357P better than EPYC 7282?

Yes. Xeon 6357P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 33.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 0.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6357P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6357P is the stronger fit. You are getting 33.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6357P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7282 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6357P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $650 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7282 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6357P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7282 vs Xeon 6357P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7282 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6357P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon 6357P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 18,000 (28.6% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 2,784, a 87.8% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,638 vs 12,769 (50.3% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.

Feature	EPYC 7282	Xeon 6357P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.1 GHz+59%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	64 MB+167%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8 MB+300%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	30,201	30,401
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	18,000+33%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,086	2,784+156%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,638	12,769+67%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6357P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon 6357P — the Xeon 6357P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 2 (Xeon 6357P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7282) vs 20 (Xeon 6357P) — the EPYC 7282 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).

Feature	EPYC 7282	Xeon 6357P
Socket	SP3	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+3100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+540%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6357P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.