
EPYC 7282

Xeon Gold 5220R
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 5220R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 5220R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 5220R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7282
2019Why buy it
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,130 less on MSRP ($650 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 172.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.5 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($650 MSRP vs $1,780 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5220R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,201 vs 30,372).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5220R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 46.5 PassMark/$ ($1,780 MSRP vs $650 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5220R better than EPYC 7282?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7282 vs Xeon Gold 5220R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Xeon Gold 5220R
The Xeon Gold 5220R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 30,372 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7282 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5220R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220R — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5220R (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the Xeon Gold 5220R's 30,372 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5220R. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 1,327, a 20% lead for the Xeon Gold 5220R that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220R.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB+200% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,201 | 30,372 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,086 | 1,327+22% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,638 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5220R — the EPYC 7282 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5220R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7282) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5220R) — the EPYC 7282 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and C620 (Xeon Gold 5220R).
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Gold 5220R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 5220R). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | Yes |
| Target Use | Edge Server / Entry Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7282 was priced at $650, while the Xeon Gold 5220R came in at $1780. On launch pricing ($650 vs $1780), EPYC 7282 was $1130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7282 delivers 46.5 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5220R — making the EPYC 7282 the 92.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7282 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $650-63% | $1780 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.5+172% | 17.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















