EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 9015

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 9015 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7282

16 / 32

30,201

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

EPYC 9015

8 / 16

30,505

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 9015 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 9015: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9015 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 15,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while EPYC 9015 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9015 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9015

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9015 better than EPYC 7282?

Yes. EPYC 9015 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9015 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9015 is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9015 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7282 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9015 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $650 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7282 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9015 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7282 vs EPYC 9015 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7282 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9015 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9015 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7282 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9015 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7282 scores 30,201 against the EPYC 9015's 30,505 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 9015. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 15,000 (10.5% advantage for the EPYC 9015). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,086 vs 1,400, a 25.3% lead for the EPYC 9015 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,638 vs 11,000 (36.1% advantage for the EPYC 9015). L3 cache: 64 MB on the EPYC 7282 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015.

Feature	EPYC 7282	EPYC 9015
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.1 GHz+28%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	64 MB	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	30,201	30,505+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	15,000+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,086	1,400+29%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,638	11,000+44%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7282 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9015 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 versus DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 — the EPYC 9015 supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7282) vs 12 (EPYC 9015). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282) and SP5 platform (EPYC 9015).

Feature	EPYC 7282	EPYC 9015
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6000+88%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9015 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015). Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server, EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216; EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6.

Feature	EPYC 7282	EPYC 9015
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Edge Server / Entry Server	Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads