EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon 6353P

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon 6353P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 72F3

8 / 16

27,252

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon 6353P

8 / 16

26,910

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon 6353P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon 6353P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 72F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6353P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6353P

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,910 vs 27,252).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 72F3 better than Xeon 6353P?

Yes. EPYC 72F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 72F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 24 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 72F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 72F3 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 72F3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6353P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon 6353P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

Xeon 6353P

The Xeon 6353P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,910 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 72F3 and Xeon 6353P share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6353P — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6353P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 72F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6353P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 72F3 scores 27,252 against the Xeon 6353P's 26,910 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 72F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6353P.

Feature	EPYC 72F3	Xeon 6353P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+37%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+967%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	27,252+1%	26,910

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 72F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6353P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.