
EPYC 7303

Ryzen 5 3600
EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7303
2023Why buy it
- β +89.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7303.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 18,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while EPYC 7303 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than EPYC 7303?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7303 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7303
The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7303 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the EPYC 7303 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 β a 21.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7303 uses the Milan (2021β2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303 scores 28,572 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 β a 47.1% lead for the EPYC 7303. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 9,500 (61.8% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,960 vs 1,295, a 40.9% lead for the EPYC 7303 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 1,898 (141.1% advantage for the EPYC 7303). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021β2023) | Matisse (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 28,572+62% | 17,685 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000+89% | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960+51% | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000+480% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7303 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7303 supports up to 204 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 59.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) β the EPYC 7303 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7303) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 204 GB+59% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | EPYC 7303 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | Yes |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server Workloads | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













