EPYC 7303P vs EPYC 8124P

EPYC 7303P vs EPYC 8124P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7303P

16 / 32

36,487

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

EPYC 8124P

16 / 32

36,079

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7303P vs EPYC 8124P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7303P vs EPYC 8124P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($594 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8124P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (36,079 vs 36,487).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8124P better than EPYC 7303P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8124P is ahead with a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8124P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7303P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 8124P comes in 7.6% more expensive on MSRP at $639 MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7303P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. EPYC 7303P is also 8.8% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 56.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7303P vs EPYC 8124P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7303P and EPYC 8124P share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P — a 12.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7303P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). The EPYC 7303P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 8124P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the EPYC 8124P's 36,079 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7303P. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	EPYC 8124P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.45 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	36,487+1%	36,079

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8124P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus 4800 on the EPYC 8124P — the EPYC 8124P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303P) vs 6 (EPYC 8124P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 96 (EPYC 8124P) — the EPYC 7303P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and SP6 (EPYC 8124P).

Feature	EPYC 7303P	EPYC 8124P
Socket	SP3	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096+100%	2048
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+33%	96

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V, IOMMU virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	EPYC 8124P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	AMD-V, IOMMU

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7303P was priced at $594, while the EPYC 8124P came in at $639. On launch pricing ($594 vs $639), EPYC 7303P was $45 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 8124P — making the EPYC 7303P the 8.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	EPYC 8124P
MSRP	$594-7%	$639
Performance per Dollar	61.4+9%	56.5
Release Date	2023	2023

Search EPYC 7303P on Amazon

Search EPYC 8124P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.