EPYC 7313P vs Core Ultra 7 265T
EPYC 7313P
Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7313P
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7313P | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($824) | ✅ More affordable ($362) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7313P | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+126%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($824) | ✅ More affordable ($362) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 7 265T
EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.
Core Ultra 7 265T
The Core Ultra 7 265T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,681 points. Launch price was $384.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7313P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265T offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T (base: 3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The EPYC 7313P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Core Ultra 7 265T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313P scores 41,017 against the Core Ultra 7 265T's 40,681 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7313P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265T.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 20 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+100% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+327% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 41,017 | 40,681 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 34,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,954 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,455 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7313P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7313P versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265T — the EPYC 7313P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7313P) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265T). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313P) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265T) — the EPYC 7313P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7313P) and Z890,H870,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265T).
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 192 GB+4915100% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7313P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265T). The Core Ultra 7 265T includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core)), while the EPYC 7313P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265T targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High End Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7313P launched at $913 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265T debuted at $384. At current prices ($824 vs $362), the Core Ultra 7 265T is $462 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313P delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 112.4 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265T — making the Core Ultra 7 265T the 77.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | Core Ultra 7 265T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $913 | $384-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $824 | $362-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8 | 112.4+126% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7313P and Core Ultra 7 265T
