EPYC 7313P vs EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7F52
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7313P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F52
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7313P | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($824) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7313P | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+120%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($824) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7F52 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F52 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7313P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7F52 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313P scores 41,017 against the EPYC 7F52's 41,388 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7F52. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 41,017 | 41,388 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7313P) and SP3 (EPYC 7F52).
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334; EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7313P launched at $913 MSRP, while the EPYC 7F52 debuted at $3100. At current prices ($824 vs $1826), the EPYC 7313P is $1002 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313P delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 22.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 7F52 — making the EPYC 7313P the 74.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7313P | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $913-71% | $3100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $824-55% | $1826 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8+119% | 22.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7313P and EPYC 7F52
