EPYC 7351
VS
Core i9-7920X

EPYC 7351 vs Core i9-7920X

AMD

EPYC 7351

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i9-7920X

12 Cores24 Thrd140 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7351

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
537%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
4%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
10%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
9%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
9%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
8%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
101%
#8
EPYC 7351
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
90%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
70%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
69%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
63%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-7920X

#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
359%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
148%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
146%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
357%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
356%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
355%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
141%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
352%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
351%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
140%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
349%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
349%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
343%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
340%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
113%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
338%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
337%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
107%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
337%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
337%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
337%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
100%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
337%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
336%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
93%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
336%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
334%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
84%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
331%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
331%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7351 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7351Core i9-7920X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($236)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-7920X ($236), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($236 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7351Core i9-7920X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($236)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7351 and Core i9-7920X

AMD

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

Intel

Core i9-7920X

The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core i9-7920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-7920X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-7920X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Core i9-7920X's 23,508 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X.

FeatureEPYC 7351Core i9-7920X
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
4.4 GHz+52%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+288%
16.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
23,226
23,508+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-7920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7351Core i9-7920X
Socket
TR4
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0