EPYC 7352
VS
Core i7-9700K

EPYC 7352 vs Core i7-9700K

AMD

EPYC 7352

24 Cores48 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7352

#289
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
MSRP: $2899|Avg: $2699.99
108%
#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
105%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
105%
#294
Xeon Gold 6444Y
MSRP: $3622|Avg: N/A
104%
#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
104%
#296
Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $965
104%
#297
EPYC 7453
MSRP: $1570|Avg: $1253
103%
#298
Xeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP: $1483|Avg: N/A
102%
#299
Xeon w5-3425
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $1189
102%
#300
EPYC 9255
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $1934
102%
#301
EPYC 8324P
MSRP: $1895|Avg: $3598
101%
#302
Xeon Gold 6414U
MSRP: $2296|Avg: $283
101%
#303
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $2495
101%
#304
EPYC 7352
MSRP: $1350|Avg: $725
100%
#305
Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP: $1789|Avg: $2544
99%
#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
98%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
97%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
97%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
97%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
96%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
95%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
95%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
95%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
94%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
94%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
93%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($725) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7352 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7352Core i7-9700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($725)
More affordable ($200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-9700K ($200), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($525 less, 72% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7352Core i7-9700K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+29%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($725)
More affordable ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Core i7-9700K

AMD

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 42% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 94.8% lead for the EPYC 7352. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureEPYC 7352Core i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+200%
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.9 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+57%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+167%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
40,370+180%
14,397
Cinebench R23 Multi
32,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,112
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,276
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 2 (Core i7-9700K). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the EPYC 7352 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureEPYC 7352Core i7-9700K
Socket
SP3
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+3100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the EPYC 7352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

FeatureEPYC 7352Core i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-density Computing / Server
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7352 launched at $1350 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700K debuted at $385. At current prices ($725 vs $200), the Core i7-9700K is $525 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the Core i7-9700K the 25.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7352Core i7-9700K
MSRP
$1350
$385-71%
Avg Price (30d)
$725
$200-72%
Performance per Dollar
55.7
72.0+29%
Release Date
2019
2018