EPYC 7352 vs Core Ultra 5 235
EPYC 7352
Core Ultra 5 235
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7352
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 235
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Core Ultra 5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($725) | ✅ More affordable ($269) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Core Ultra 5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+167%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($725) | ✅ More affordable ($269) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 5 235
EPYC 7352
The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.
Core Ultra 5 235
The Core Ultra 5 235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 39,924 points. Launch price was $257.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235 offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Core Ultra 5 235's 39,924 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7352. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,112 vs 2,600, a 80.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,276 vs 13,000 (56.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core Ultra 5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+71% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 5 GHz+56% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+33% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 40,370+1% | 39,924 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 32,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,112 | 2,600+134% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,276 | 13,000+79% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235 — the Core Ultra 5 235 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 235). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 20 (Core Ultra 5 235) — the EPYC 7352 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 235).
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core Ultra 5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+1500% | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 235). The Core Ultra 5 235 includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU), while the EPYC 7352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server, Core Ultra 5 235 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Core Ultra 5 235 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core Ultra 5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-density Computing / Server | Mainstream Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7352 launched at $1350 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 235 debuted at $257. At current prices ($725 vs $269), the Core Ultra 5 235 is $456 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 148.4 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 235 — making the Core Ultra 5 235 the 90.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core Ultra 5 235 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1350 | $257-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $725 | $269-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.7 | 148.4+166% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7352 and Core Ultra 5 235
