EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Gold 6312U

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Gold 6312U Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7402P

24 / 48

43,759

+3.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Gold 6312U

24 / 48

42,443

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Gold 6312U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Gold 6312U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Why buy it

✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $365 less on MSRP ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,645 MSRP).
✅Delivers 32.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.2 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $1,645 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 185W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6312U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 6312U

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (42,443 vs 43,759).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($1,645 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7402P better than Xeon Gold 6312U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6312U is ahead with a 13.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7402P pulls ahead with 3.1% better PassMark. EPYC 7402P also has the bigger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7402P is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7402P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7402P comes in $365 cheaper on MSRP at $1,280 MSRP versus $1,645 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6312U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 32.5% better value on MSRP (34.2 vs 25.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6312U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7402P vs Xeon Gold 6312U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402P

The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Xeon Gold 6312U

The Xeon Gold 6312U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,443 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7402P and Xeon Gold 6312U share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6312U — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6312U (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7402P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6312U uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402P scores 43,759 against the Xeon Gold 6312U's 42,443 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 7402P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6312U.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Gold 6312U
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+17%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+256%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	43,759+3%	42,443

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6312U uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6312U supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6312U) — the EPYC 7402P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7402P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6312U).

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Gold 6312U
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6312U). Direct competitor: EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Xeon Gold 6312U rivals EPYC 7413.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Gold 6312U
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7402P was priced at $1280, while the Xeon Gold 6312U came in at $1645. On launch pricing ($1280 vs $1645), EPYC 7402P was $365 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402P delivers 34.2 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6312U — making the EPYC 7402P the 28% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP	$1280-22%	$1645
Performance per Dollar	34.2+33%	25.8
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7402P on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6312U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.