EPYC 7501 vs EPYC 7351P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7501

#143

Xeon W-1350P

MSRP: $311|Avg: $250

101%

#145

Xeon 6511P

MSRP: $815|Avg: $815

101%

#148

EPYC 7501

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#153

EPYC 7303P

MSRP: $594|Avg: $594

99%

#155

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $999

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7351P

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

668%

#1

Core i9-9990XE

MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A

5%

#2

Xeon W-11855M

MSRP: $450|Avg: $200

12%

#3

Xeon W-11955M

MSRP: $623|Avg: $450

11%

#4

Xeon W-11865MLE

MSRP: $467|Avg: $350

11%

#5

Xeon W-11865MRE

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

11%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

126%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

112%

#12

EPYC 7351P

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

87%

#16

EPYC 7302

MSRP: $978|Avg: $109

86%

#21

Xeon Platinum 8260M

MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A

79%

#22

Xeon Platinum 8268

MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A

78%

#24

Xeon Gold 6130H

MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The EPYC 7501 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the EPYC 7351P in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	EPYC 7501	EPYC 7351P
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)	✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	EPYC 7501	EPYC 7351P
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7501 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7351P Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7501 and EPYC 7351P

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

EPYC 7351P

The EPYC 7351P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,871 points. Launch price was $750.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 7351P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351P — a 3.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 7501 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the EPYC 7351P's 24,871 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7501. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7501	EPYC 7351P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+100%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz+3%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	24,925	24,871