EPYC 7502 vs Xeon 6511P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7502

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6511P

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon 6511P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7502

32 / 64

52,107

+1.6%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon 6511P

16 / 32

51,286

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon 6511P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon 6511P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7502

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 72 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 62.9 PassMark/$ ($2,600 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6511P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6511P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,785 less on MSRP ($815 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 214.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 62.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($815 MSRP vs $2,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (51,286 vs 52,107).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (72 MB vs 128 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6511P better than EPYC 7502?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6511P is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7502 pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. EPYC 7502 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 72 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7502 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 72 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6511P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6511P comes in $1,785 cheaper on MSRP at $815 MSRP versus $2,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7502 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 214.0% better value on MSRP (62.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6511P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7502 vs Xeon 6511P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7502

The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

Xeon 6511P

The Xeon 6511P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 51,286 points. Launch price was $815.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7502 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6511P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6511P — a 22.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 6511P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7502 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6511P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502 scores 52,107 against the Xeon 6511P's 51,286 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 7502. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502 vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6511P.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon 6511P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+100%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.2 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+78%	72 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	52,107+2%	51,286
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	20,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7502 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6511P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7502 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6511P — the Xeon 6511P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502) vs 136 (Xeon 6511P) — the Xeon 6511P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502) and C741 (Xeon 6511P).

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon 6511P
Socket	TR4	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6511P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon 6511P rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon 6511P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7502 was priced at $2600, while the Xeon 6511P came in at $815. On launch pricing ($2600 vs $815), Xeon 6511P was $1785 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7502 delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 62.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6511P — making the Xeon 6511P the 103.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7502	Xeon 6511P
MSRP	$2600	$815-69%
Performance per Dollar	20.0	62.9+215%
Release Date	2019	2025

Search EPYC 7502 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6511P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.