
EPYC 7551P vs Core i5-10400F

EPYC 7551P

Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7551P
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7551P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($329) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7551P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+10%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($329) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7551P and Core i5-10400F

EPYC 7551P
The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7551P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7551P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551P scores 38,111 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 98.1% lead for the EPYC 7551P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+433% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 38,111+193% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7551P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7551P versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the EPYC 7551P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7551P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7551P) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7551P) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the EPYC 7551P offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7551P) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+66550% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7551P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7551P launched at $2100 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($329 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $227 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7551P delivers 115.8 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 9.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7551P | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2100 | $160-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $329 | $102-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.8 | 127.7+10% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















