EPYC 7642 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF
EPYC 7642
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7642
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265KF
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7642 | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($323) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7642 | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+160%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($323) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 7 265KF
EPYC 7642
The EPYC 7642 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 59,333 points. Launch price was $4,775.
Core Ultra 7 265KF
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,690 points. Launch price was $379.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7642 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC 7642 has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7642 versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265KF — a 47.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The EPYC 7642 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7642 scores 59,333 against the Core Ultra 7 265KF's 58,690 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7642. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7642 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265KF.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+140% | 20 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz+62% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+63% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+753% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 59,333+1% | 58,690 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 35,315 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,055 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,373 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7642 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7642 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265KF — the EPYC 7642 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7642 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7642) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265KF). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7642) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) — the EPYC 7642 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7642) and Intel Z890 (Core Ultra 7 265KF).
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 192 GB+4915100% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7642) vs true (Core Ultra 7 265KF). Direct competitor: EPYC 7642 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Core Ultra 7 265KF rivals Ryzen 7 9700X.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7642 launched at $4775 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF debuted at $379. At current prices ($850 vs $323), the Core Ultra 7 265KF is $527 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7642 delivers 69.8 pts/$ vs 181.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265KF — making the Core Ultra 7 265KF the 89% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7642 | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4775 | $379-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $850 | $323-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.8 | 181.7+160% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 7 265KF
