Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 7713P

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7713P
64 / 128
81,582
+8.8%
brand logoRyzen 9 5950X
brand logoRyzen 9 9900X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
32 / 64
74,985
0.0%
brand logoRyzen AI Max 390
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen 9 7945HX3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low195 FPS
medium159 FPS
high129 FPS
ultra100 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low223 FPS
medium184 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra114 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low267 FPS
medium235 FPS
high193 FPS
ultra158 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low777 FPS
medium660 FPS
high516 FPS
ultra447 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low837 FPS
medium698 FPS
high650 FPS
ultra574 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low783 FPS
medium661 FPS
high604 FPS
ultra528 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low975 FPS
medium883 FPS
high758 FPS
ultra656 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low1212 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high924 FPS
ultra818 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low315 FPS
medium243 FPS
high222 FPS
ultra199 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low250 FPS
medium222 FPS
high175 FPS
ultra141 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low327 FPS
medium288 FPS
high228 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low369 FPS
medium328 FPS
high285 FPS
ultra243 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 7713P
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
low283 FPS
medium262 FPS
high221 FPS
ultra207 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7713P

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅+8.8% higher PassMark.
  • ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅Draws 225W instead of 280W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +45.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $2,515 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 84.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (74,985 vs 81,582).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ❌24.4% higher power demand at 280W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than EPYC 7713P?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is ahead with a 45.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713P pulls ahead with 8.8% better PassMark. EPYC 7713P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7713P is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX comes in $2,515 cheaper on MSRP at $2,495 MSRP versus $5,010 MSRP, and it still gives you a 45.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7713P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 8.8% better PassMark. It is also 84.6% better value on MSRP (30.1 vs 16.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7713P

The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7713P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7713P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7713P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713P scores 81,582 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 8.4% lead for the EPYC 7713P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

FeatureEPYC 7713PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Cores / Threads
64 / 128+100%
32 / 64
Boost Clock
3.68 GHz
4.5 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+100%
128 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
81,582+9%
74,985
Cinebench R23 Multi
—
53,977
Geekbench 6 Single
—
1,686
Geekbench 6 Multi
—
29,745
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7713P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7713P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).

FeatureEPYC 7713PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Socket
SP3
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+100%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

FeatureEPYC 7713PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7713P was priced at $5010, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX came in at $2495. On launch pricing ($5010 vs $2495), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX was $2515 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713P delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 59.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7713PRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP
$5010
$2495-50%
Performance per Dollar
16.3
30.1+85%
Release Date
2021
2022
Search EPYC 7713P on AmazonSearch Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.