
EPYC 7713P

Xeon 6740E
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon 6740E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon 6740E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon 6740E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7713P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($5,010 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 250W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6740E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (76,167 vs 81,582).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7713P better than Xeon 6740E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7713P vs Xeon 6740E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7713P
The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.

Xeon 6740E
The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7713P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6740E offers 96 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E — a 14% clock advantage for the EPYC 7713P (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7713P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon 6740E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7713P scores 81,582 against the Xeon 6740E's 76,167 — a 6.9% lead for the EPYC 7713P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E.
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 96 / 96+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.68 GHz+15% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+167% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 81,582+7% | 76,167 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7713P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6740E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7713P versus 6400 on the Xeon 6740E — the Xeon 6740E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7713P) vs 80 (Xeon 6740E) — the EPYC 7713P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7713P) and C741 (Xeon 6740E).
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6740E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P) vs VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E). Direct competitor: EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, TDX |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7713P was priced at $5010, while the Xeon 6740E came in at $5265. On launch pricing ($5010 vs $5265), EPYC 7713P was $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7713P delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740E — making the EPYC 7713P the 11.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7713P | Xeon 6740E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5010-5% | $5265 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+12% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















