EPYC 8324P vs Core Ultra 9 275HX
EPYC 8324P
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8324P
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 8324P | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,598) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 8324P | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,598) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324P and Core Ultra 9 275HX
EPYC 8324P
The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.
Core Ultra 9 275HX
The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 275HX offers 24 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 56,018 — a 2% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+80% |
| Base Clock | 2.65 GHz | 2.7 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+256% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| PassMark | 57,127+2% | 56,018 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,835 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,908 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — the EPYC 8324P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8324P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 127.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) — the EPYC 8324P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX).
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | FCBGA2114 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 256 GB+23301589% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 9 275HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8324P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 275HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the EPYC 8324P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High-End Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324P and Core Ultra 9 275HX
