EPYC 8324PN vs U300
EPYC 8324PN
U300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The EPYC 8324PN is positioned at rank 613 and the U300 is on rank 372, so the U300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8324PN
Performance Per Dollar U300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 8324PN | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 8324PN | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and U300
EPYC 8324PN
The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.
U300
The U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,492 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 27 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4.4 GHz on the U300 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the U300. The EPYC 8324PN is built on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the U300's 8,492 — a 1.4% lead for the U300. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the U300.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+540% | 5 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | 2.05 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+1500% | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 8,375 | 8,492+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 8324PN | U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324PN and U300
