EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2428L

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2428L Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324PN

32 / 64

8,375

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2428L

6 / 12

8,500

+1.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2428L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2428L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1356 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 8,500).
❌116.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 60W.

Xeon E5-2428L

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 60W instead of 130W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324PN across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $692 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA1356, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2428L better than EPYC 8324PN?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8324PN is ahead with a 27.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2428L pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. EPYC 8324PN also has the bigger cache pool with 753.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2428L is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2428L is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2428L comes in at an unclear MSRP at $692 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 8324PN is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 27.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1356, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 15 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2428L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Xeon E5-2428L

The Xeon E5-2428L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,500 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon E5-2428L offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2428L — a 40% clock advantage for the EPYC 8324PN (base: 2.05 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Xeon E5-2428L's 8,500 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2428L. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2428L.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E5-2428L
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+433%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3 GHz+50%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.05 GHz+14%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+753%	15360 kB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-84%	32 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	8,375	8,500+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.