EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon W-2123

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon W-2123 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324PN

32 / 64

8,375

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon W-2123

4 / 8

8,519

+1.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon W-2123 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon W-2123: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 8,519).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2123

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 120W instead of 130W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324PN across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while EPYC 8324PN mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2123 better than EPYC 8324PN?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8324PN is ahead with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2123 pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. EPYC 8324PN also has the bigger cache pool with 1451.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2123 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2123 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2123 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 8324PN is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 8.3 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon W-2123 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Xeon W-2123

The Xeon W-2123 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,519 points. Launch price was $294.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon W-2123 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2123 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2123 (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-2123 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Xeon W-2123's 8,519 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon W-2123. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2123.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon W-2123
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+700%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.9 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	3.6 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+1452%	8.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	8,375	8,519+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,172
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	4,215

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2123 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.