EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2628 V3

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2628 V3 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324PN

32 / 64

8,375

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2628 V3

8 / 16

8,447

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2628 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2628 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 8,447).
❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.

Xeon E5-2628 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324PN across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2628 V3 better than EPYC 8324PN?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8324PN is ahead with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2628 V3 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. EPYC 8324PN also has the bigger cache pool with 540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2628 V3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2628 V3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2628 V3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 20 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E5-2628 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Xeon E5-2628 V3

The Xeon E5-2628 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 8,447 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon E5-2628 V3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2628 V3 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.05 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E5-2628 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Xeon E5-2628 V3's 8,447 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2628 V3. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2628 V3.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E5-2628 V3
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	2.5 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+540%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	5 nm-77%	22 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	8,375	8,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2628 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.