EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E3-1275 v5

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E3-1275 v5 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324PN

32 / 64

8,375

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1275 v5

4 / 8

8,291

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E3-1275 v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E3-1275 v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Xeon E3-1275 v5

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324PN across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,291 vs 8,375).
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8324PN better than Xeon E3-1275 v5?

Yes. EPYC 8324PN is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 8324PN is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 8 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324PN is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8324PN still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 8324PN comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 8 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon E3-1275 v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Xeon E3-1275 v5

The Xeon E3-1275 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 8,291 points. Launch price was $350.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon E3-1275 v5 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1275 v5 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1275 v5 (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E3-1275 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Xeon E3-1275 v5's 8,291 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 8324PN. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1275 v5.

Feature	EPYC 8324PN	Xeon E3-1275 v5
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+700%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	3.6 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+1500%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	8,375+1%	8,291

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1275 v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.