EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 9 8945H

AMD

EPYC 9015

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 8945H

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 9 8945H Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 9 8945H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 9 8945H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9015

2024

Why buy it

  • +300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • 540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 17,500).
  • 1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 8945H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 8945H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while EPYC 9015 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9015, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 8945H better than EPYC 9015?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9015 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 8945H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 8945H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 8945H is the stronger fit. You are getting 16.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 8945H still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 8945H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9015 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 9 8945H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

AMD

Ryzen 9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,240 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9015 and Ryzen 9 8945H share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945H — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945H (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 8945H uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Ryzen 9 8945H's 30,240 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 9015. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 17,500 (15.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 2,617, a 60.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 8945H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 12,662 (14% advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945H). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 8945H.

FeatureEPYC 9015Ryzen 9 8945H
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
5.2 GHz+27%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+300%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
8 MB+700%
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
30,505
30,240
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
17,500+17%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,400
2,617+87%
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
12,662+15%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 8945H uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 8945H — the EPYC 9015 supports 7.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 8945H). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 8945H) — the EPYC 9015 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 8945H).

FeatureEPYC 9015Ryzen 9 8945H
Socket
SP5
FP7/FP7r2/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+7%
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+1500%
256 GB
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 8945H). The Ryzen 9 8945H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 9015 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Ryzen 9 8945H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6; Ryzen 9 8945H rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureEPYC 9015Ryzen 9 8945H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V
Target Use
Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads
Gaming