EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen AI 9 365

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen AI 9 365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9015

2024

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 365 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen AI 9 365

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 880M, while EPYC 9015 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (30,187 vs 30,505).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9015, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while EPYC 9015 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 365 better than EPYC 9015?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9015 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 365 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9015 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 365 is the better buy right now. Ryzen AI 9 365 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9015 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (75.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 365 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen AI 9 365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,187 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9015 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 365 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — a 19.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 365 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Ryzen AI 9 365's 30,187 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 9015. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 365.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Ryzen AI 9 365
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5 GHz+22%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+167%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	30,505+1%	30,187
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — the EPYC 9015 supports 7.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 365). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 20 (Ryzen AI 9 365) — the EPYC 9015 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Ryzen AI 9 365
Socket	SP5	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+7%	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+6300%	64 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+540%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 365). The Ryzen AI 9 365 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 880M), while the EPYC 9015 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Ryzen AI 9 365 targets Mobile AI. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Ryzen AI 9 365
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 880M
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads	Mobile AI