EPYC 9115
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
EPYC 9115 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9115 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9115 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9115
2024Why buy it
- ✅+3.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($726 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $317 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 66.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9115 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,828 vs 48,343).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9115, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than EPYC 9115?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9115 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9115
The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9115 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 9115 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — a 27.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9115 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9115 scores 48,343 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945's 46,828 — a 3.2% lead for the EPYC 9115. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 48,343+3% | 46,828 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 28,905 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,832 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9115 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9115 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9115) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9115) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — the EPYC 9115 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9115) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945).
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9115) vs true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9115 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9115 was priced at $726, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 came in at $409. On launch pricing ($726 vs $409), Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 was $317 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9115 delivers 66.6 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 52.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9115 | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $726 | $409-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.6 | 114.5+72% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9115 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
