
EPYC 9184X

EPYC 9224
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC 9224 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC 9224 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC 9224: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,573).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 320W vs 200W.
EPYC 9224
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $3,103 less on MSRP ($1,825 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 320W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9224 better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC 9224 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

EPYC 9224
The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9224 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9224 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the EPYC 9224's 48,573 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 9224. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+14% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz+42% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 47,665 | 48,573+2% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and SP5 (EPYC 9224).
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9184X was priced at $4928, while the EPYC 9224 came in at $1825. On launch pricing ($4928 vs $1825), EPYC 9224 was $3103 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9224 — making the EPYC 9224 the 93.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC 9224 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4928 | $1825-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7 | 26.6+174% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















