
EPYC 9184X

Xeon Gold 6314U
EPYC 9184X vs Xeon Gold 6314U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9184X vs Xeon Gold 6314U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9184X vs Xeon Gold 6314U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,916).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
- ❌56.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 205W.
Xeon Gold 6314U
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($2,977 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 320W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9184X moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6314U better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9184X vs Xeon Gold 6314U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

Xeon Gold 6314U
The Xeon Gold 6314U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,916 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6314U offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6314U has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6314U — a 21.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6314U uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the Xeon Gold 6314U's 48,916 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6314U. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6314U.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+24% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz+54% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1500% | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 47,665 | 48,916+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6314U uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9184X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6314U — the EPYC 9184X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6314U). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Gold 6314U).
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6314U). Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon Gold 6314U rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9184X was priced at $4928, while the Xeon Gold 6314U came in at $2977. On launch pricing ($4928 vs $2977), Xeon Gold 6314U was $1951 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6314U — making the Xeon Gold 6314U the 51.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | Xeon Gold 6314U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4928 | $2977-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7 | 16.4+69% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















