
EPYC 9184X

EPYC Embedded 8224P
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,869).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 320W vs 160W.
EPYC Embedded 8224P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $4,073 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 490.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 320W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 33.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz+39% | 2.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa-X (2023) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 47,665 | 48,869+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9184X) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC 9184X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+433% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 12+100% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9184X was priced at $4928, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($4928 vs $855), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $4073 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 57.2 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 142.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9184X | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4928 | $855-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7 | 57.2+490% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















