EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

AMD

EPYC 9184X

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9184X

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (47,665 vs 48,869).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 320W vs 160W.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

  • +2.5% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $4,073 less on MSRP ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
  • Delivers 490.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
  • Draws 160W instead of 320W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9184X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than EPYC 9184X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9184X is ahead with a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P pulls ahead with 2.5% better PassMark. EPYC 9184X also has the bigger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better buy right now. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in $4,073 cheaper on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $4,928 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9184X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 490.9% better value on MSRP (57.2 vs 9.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9184X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 768 MB L3 cache instead of 64 MB. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9184X vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9184X

The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.

AMD

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9184X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 33.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9184X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9184X uses the Genoa-X (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9184X scores 47,665 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.

FeatureEPYC 9184XEPYC Embedded 8224P
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+40%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.55 GHz+39%
2.55 GHz
L3 Cache
768 MB (total)+1100%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
5 nm
Architecture
Genoa-X (2023)
Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark
47,665
48,869+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9184X uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9184X) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9184X) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC 9184X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9184X) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).

FeatureEPYC 9184XEPYC Embedded 8224P
Socket
SP5
SP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800
4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144+433%
1152
RAM Channels
12+100%
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+33%
96
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

FeatureEPYC 9184XEPYC Embedded 8224P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9184X was priced at $4928, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($4928 vs $855), EPYC Embedded 8224P was $4073 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9184X delivers 9.7 pts/$ vs 57.2 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 142.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9184XEPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP
$4928
$855-83%
Performance per Dollar
9.7
57.2+490%
Release Date
2023
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.