
EPYC 9275F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9275F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +52.7% higher average FPS across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 121.5 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,280 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 121.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($159 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,311 vs 84,620).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9275F, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9275F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9275F
2024Ryzen 5 5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +52.7% higher average FPS across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,280 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 121.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($159 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 121.5 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 22 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,311 vs 84,620).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9275F, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9275F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9275F better than Ryzen 5 5500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 162 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 923 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 748 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 724 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1141 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 902 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 813 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 785 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 650 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 308 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9275F and Ryzen 5 5500

EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.


Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500
The Ryzen 5 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,311 points. Launch price was $159.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5500 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9275F has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5500 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5500 uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the Ryzen 5 5500's 19,311 — a 125.7% lead for the EPYC 9275F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5500.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+14% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+1500% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 84,620+338% | 19,311 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5500 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5500 — the EPYC 9275F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5500). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9275F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5500) — the EPYC 9275F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 5 5500).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+149900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 128 GB+2184433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5500 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9275F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5500). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5500 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9275F launched at $3439 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5500 debuted at $159. On MSRP ($3439 vs $159), the Ryzen 5 5500 is $3280 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 121.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5500 — making the Ryzen 5 5500 the 132.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 5 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439 | $159-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 121.5+394% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












