EPYC 9275F vs Xeon w9-3575X

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon w9-3575X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9275F

24 / 48

84,620

+2.6%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Xeon w9-3575X

44 / 88

82,507

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon w9-3575X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon w9-3575X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9275F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).
✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($3,439 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
✅Delivers 13.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
✅Draws 320W instead of 340W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon w9-3575X

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (82,507 vs 84,620).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (98 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($3,789 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9275F better than Xeon w9-3575X?

Yes. EPYC 9275F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9275F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9275F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 162.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 98 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9275F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9275F comes in $350 cheaper on MSRP at $3,439 MSRP versus $3,789 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 13.0% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 21.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3575X is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 9275F vs Xeon w9-3575X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9275F

The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.

Xeon w9-3575X

The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w9-3575X offers 44 cores / 88 threads — the Xeon w9-3575X has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the Xeon w9-3575X's 82,507 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 9275F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X.

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon w9-3575X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	44 / 88+83%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+86%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+163%	97.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	84,620+3%	82,507
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	60,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,320

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3575X — the EPYC 9275F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3575X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9275F) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) — the EPYC 9275F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and W790 (Xeon w9-3575X).

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon w9-3575X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w9-3575X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs true (Xeon w9-3575X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon w9-3575X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9275F was priced at $3439, while the Xeon w9-3575X came in at $3789. On launch pricing ($3439 vs $3789), EPYC 9275F was $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3575X — making the EPYC 9275F the 12.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9275F	Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP	$3439-9%	$3789
Performance per Dollar	24.6+13%	21.8
Release Date	2024	2024

Search EPYC 9275F on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3575X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.