EPYC 9565 vs EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9565
EPYC 9475F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9565
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9475F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9565 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,233) | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9565 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,233) | ✅ More affordable ($7,592) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9565 and EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9565
The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.
EPYC 9475F
The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the EPYC 9475F offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9565 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F — a 11% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.15 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the EPYC 9475F's 122,476 — a 9.9% lead for the EPYC 9565. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 72 / 144+50% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.15 GHz | 3.65 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+50% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 135,221+10% | 122,476 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 45,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9475F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9565) and SP5 (EPYC 9475F).
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6144 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9565) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9475F). Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, EPYC 9475F targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Computing | Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9565 launched at $10486 MSRP, while the EPYC 9475F debuted at $7592. At current prices ($8233 vs $7592), the EPYC 9475F is $641 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 16.4 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9475F — making the EPYC 9565 the 1.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9565 | EPYC 9475F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10486 | $7592-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8233 | $7592-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4+2% | 16.1 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9565 and EPYC 9475F
