
FirePro 2460 vs FirePro 3D V3700

FirePro 2460
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 2460 is positioned at rank 353 and the FirePro 3D V3700 is on rank 303, so the FirePro 3D V3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2460
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V3700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 2460 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V3700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $10), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 5.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 2460 and FirePro 3D V3700

FirePro 2460
The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

FirePro 3D V3700
The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2460 scores 170 versus the FirePro 3D V3700's 179 — the FirePro 3D V3700 leads by 5.3%. The FirePro 2460 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro 3D V3700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2460) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3700).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 179+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+353% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2460 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3700 has 256 MB. The FirePro 2460 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro 2460) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3700) — the FirePro 3D V3700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2460) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3700). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11+9% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4+33% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460) vs UVD (FirePro 3D V3700). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3700).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2460 draws 75W versus the FirePro 3D V3700's 274W — a 114% difference. The FirePro 2460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2460) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-73% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.3+229% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 2460 launched at $180 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the FirePro 3D V3700 launched at $99 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.0 (FirePro 2460) vs 17.9 (FirePro 3D V3700) — the FirePro 3D V3700 offers 5.3% better value. The FirePro 3D V3700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 2460 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180 | $99-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 17.9+5% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Tahiti |
| Release | June 13 2012 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #732 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















