
FirePro 3D V7750 vs FirePro 3D V5700

FirePro 3D V7750
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V7750 is positioned at rank 371 and the FirePro 3D V5700 is on rank 355, so the FirePro 3D V5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7750
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V7750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7750 and FirePro 3D V5700

FirePro 3D V7750
The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

FirePro 3D V5700
The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7750 scores 545 and the FirePro 3D V5700 reaches 547 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro 3D V5700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5700).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 545 | 547 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V7750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V5700 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V5700). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V5700). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V5700).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7750 draws 274W versus the FirePro 3D V5700's 274W — a 0% difference. The FirePro 3D V5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 234mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 234mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V7750 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 3D V5700 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The FirePro 3D V7750 costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.3 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 21.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) — the FirePro 3D V7750 offers 24.7% better value.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $599-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-20% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.3+25% | 21.9 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Tahiti |
| Release | January 18 2014 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #423 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











