
FirePro 3D V7750 vs GeForce 8800 GTX

FirePro 3D V7750
Popular choices:

GeForce 8800 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V7750 is positioned at rank 371 and the GeForce 8800 GTX is on rank 698, so the FirePro 3D V7750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro 3D V7750 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The FirePro 3D V7750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8800 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8800 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V7750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V7750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 145.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V7750 and GeForce 8800 GTX

FirePro 3D V7750
The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

GeForce 8800 GTX
The GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7750 scores 545 and the GeForce 8800 GTX reaches 556 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8800 GTX uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GTX).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 545 | 556+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+814% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V7750 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GTX has 768 MB. The FirePro 3D V7750 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+33% | 0.75 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GTX). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs None (GeForce 8800 GTX). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 8800 GTX).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7750 draws 274W versus the GeForce 8800 GTX's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The GeForce 8800 GTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 234mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 234mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 3.7+85% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V7750 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 8800 GTX launched at $599 and now averages $50. The FirePro 3D V7750 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.3 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 11.1 (GeForce 8800 GTX) — the FirePro 3D V7750 offers 145.9% better value. The FirePro 3D V7750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7750 | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $599-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.3+146% | 11.1 |
| Codename | Tahiti | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | January 18 2014 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #423 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











