
FirePro 3D V8800
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V8800 is positioned at rank #312 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8800
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8800 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V8800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $350 for the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H, it costs 91% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1095.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8800 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1095.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8800 and Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H

FirePro 3D V8800
The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,379 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8800 scores 2,438 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H reaches 2,379 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,438+2% | 2,379 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 1408+76% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+371% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 88+120% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8800 draws 74W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H's 110W — a 39.1% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W-33% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.9+52% | 21.6 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V8800 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H launched at $350 and now averages $350. The FirePro 3D V8800 costs 91.4% less ($320 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.3 (FirePro 3D V8800) vs 6.8 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H) — the FirePro 3D V8800 offers 1095.6% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8800 | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $350-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-91% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.3+1096% | 6.8 |
| Codename | Juniper | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 26 2010 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #780 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















