FirePro M40003
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro M40003 vs GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro M40003

2012Core: 675 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro M40003 is positioned at rank #151 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M40003

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
99%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
95%
#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
83%
#136
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1625%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
100%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
100%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
99%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
97%
#158
Quadro M2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $70
94%
#159
Quadro M4000
MSRP: $791|Avg: $350
93%
#160
FirePro W4100
MSRP: $183|Avg: $183
90%
#166
FirePro W5100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 637.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M40003.

InsightFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-637.8%)
Leading raw performance (+637.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $72), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 785.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+785.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($72)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M40003 and GeForce GTX 1060

AMD

FirePro M40003

The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 637.8%. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,364
10,064+638%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
512
2560+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+1184%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
160+400%
L1 Cache
128 KB
960 KB+650%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M40003 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M40003) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 138% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
TDP
33W-82%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
82mm
173mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
41.3
55.9+35%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M40003 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $72, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 16.7% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.9 (FirePro M40003) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 787.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M40003GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$150-40%
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$72
$60-17%
Performance per Dollar
18.9
167.7+787%
Codename
Chelsea
GP104
Release
June 27 2012
May 27 2016
Ranking
#752
#137