FirePro M40003
GeForce RTX 2060
FirePro M40003 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M40003 vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro M40003 vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M40003
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 160W, a 127W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 229mm, a 147mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,364 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+934.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 344.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌384.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 33W.
- ❌179.3% longer card at 229mm vs 82mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M40003 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro M40003 scores 1,364 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 934.8%. The FirePro M40003 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M40003) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,364 | 14,114+935% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1920+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+833% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 120+275% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1.9 MB+1362% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M40003 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M40003 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M40003 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M40003) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M40003) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M40003 draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 131.6% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M40003) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72.
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-79% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 82mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3 | 88.2+114% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M40003 came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, FirePro M40003 was 57% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (FirePro M40003) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 344% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M40003 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-57% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 40.4+344% |
| Codename | Chelsea | TU106 |
| Release | June 27 2012 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #752 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M40003 and GeForce RTX 2060
